You Are Here: Home » Environment » Mining


For several weeks now, various stakeholders here in my country, the Philippines, have been debating, clashing and trading barbs through the media on the benefits of mining.

On one side, giant mining companies, which earn big from the business, are defending the benefits of mining. It helps the local communities they say.
On the other side, environmentalists and local communities are stressing that mining does more harm than good. There aren’t a lot of extensive report on the impact of mining here in the Philippines but daily reports have made it to the headlines and usually point to the fact that mining, more often than not, is more detrimental to local communities that it is beneficial.

It is not to say though that mining cannot exist. Yes, clearly, mining is the source of many of the day-to-day products that we not only enjoy today but need as well. However, I believe that it should not be done in developing countries like the Philippines.

A video documentary on mining in Papua New Guinea produced by Human Rights Watch showed that the benefits of mining has not really trickled down to the local communities.

Here in the Philippines, the Finance Secretary, Cesar Purisima believes that the government deserves a much bigger share from ongoing projects.
“What we want is for the government to get a better share from mining,” he said. At least the government should get a 50 percent share in mining revenues, he said.

The current administration is currently consulting various stakeholders in the mining industry as its prepares to issue a new Executive Order on mining. I can only hope that if it cannot ban mining, it should ensure that the communities and the local government indeed get a greater share so the industry would indeed lead to development.

A forum on mining will be part of the Rio+20 Summit on Sustainable Development. “The forum will foster a space for respectful discussion and debate about how to do mining responsibly in megadiverse countries,” it said.
The subject panels proposed issues of regional sustainability, environmental standards for the mining industry, economic linkages to bind sustainable development and policy for responsible mining.

I hope the practices in the Philippines will be part of the discussion. Fingers crossed.

Clip to Evernote

About The Author(s)

Iris Gonzales

Iris Gonzales


I'm a Manila-based journalist and blogger. At present, I work for The Philippine Star, covering public finance and the macroeconomy but I also write many other stories here and there. I blog about development and human rights issues for the London-based The New Internationalist.

Comments (2)

  • Giedre

    That is always their excuse: “we provide jobs”. This almost always proves to be deceptive: first, there may not be as many jobs and they may not be decently paid; second, these jobs prove to be very anti-labour: corporations don’t like workers organising themselves and they don’t care much about health and safety of those workers.

    They come, take what they can, and they leave. Local communities are the ones left to pick up the bill, the first item on which is polluted water.

  • Kevin Rennie

    In Australia when the big miners have faced proposed new taxes on super profits, their response has been to threaten to move to their operations to developing countries. They are currently trying to wind back ‘green tape’ – code for environmental planning safeguards.


Leave a Comment

© 2012 - ThinkBrigade with support by the European Journalism Centre (EJC).

Scroll to top